<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wellington Leg a Construct?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidthayer.booksquare.com/archives/2007/02/03/610/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidthayer.booksquare.com/archives/2007/02/03/610/</link>
	<description>One more bite of the apple.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 03:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: david i</title>
		<link>http://davidthayer.booksquare.com/archives/2007/02/03/610/#comment-25297</link>
		<dc:creator>david i</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 00:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidthayer.booksquare.com/archives/2007/02/03/610/#comment-25297</guid>
		<description>"If Wellington Leg is a figment or construct the towne may qualify for federal aid..."

Or, at the very least, ought to be collecting royalties. Or paying them. Or something. At any rate, there are both direct fiscal implications as well as possible tax contingencies.

The whole thing opens up a can of...entrails? (Quick, call the haruspex!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If Wellington Leg is a figment or construct the towne may qualify for federal aid&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Or, at the very least, ought to be collecting royalties. Or paying them. Or something. At any rate, there are both direct fiscal implications as well as possible tax contingencies.</p>
<p>The whole thing opens up a can of&#8230;entrails? (Quick, call the haruspex!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.471 seconds -->
